Fresh controversy has erupted around Ghanaian businessman Frederick Kumi, popularly known as Abu Trica, after a close associate publicly dismissed viral claims that he has allegedly named other people in connection with his ongoing U.S. case.
In a video circulating online, the man, identified in reports as David Quarcoo, said he recently spoke with Abu Trica through a video call and insisted that reports suggesting he had “snitched” on others were false.
According to Quarcoo, Abu Trica even laughed when the allegations were brought up during their conversation.
The comments come after social media reports claimed Abu Trica had allegedly mentioned several individuals, including a Ghanaian politician, while dealing with U.S. authorities. However, no verified court filing cited in the reports reviewed for this article confirms that Abu Trica has provided such information.
Abu Trica was extradited from Ghana to the United States in July 2026 to face federal charges linked to an alleged multimillion-dollar romance fraud scheme targeting elderly Americans.
U.S. prosecutors accuse him and others of participating in a network that allegedly used fake identities and online relationships to obtain money from victims. Abu Trica has denied the charges.
The guy did a video call with Abu Trica yesterday and he says Abu Trica hasn’t snitched on anyone so all what we are hearing are lies. A lot of people can be arrested because they mentioned the central regional MP in their tweets.😳 pic.twitter.com/cpaJxz9D5b
— theforexguy💎 (@badmanforex) September 27, 2026
The latest video has now added another twist to the widely followed case, with supporters using the call to challenge rumors circulating online.
Still, a private video call cannot by itself establish what information may or may not have been shared with investigators, and the reported claims remain unverified unless supported by official court records or statements from prosecutors.
For now, the friend’s message is clear: he says Abu Trica has not betrayed or exposed anyone, and the viral claims should not be treated as fact without evidence.
As the U.S. proceedings continue, attention is likely to remain focused on official filings for any confirmed developments in the case.
